The Wall Street Journal today noted a controversy over the Olympic medal count, whether to rank countries by their total medal count (the
The controversy is more stark further down the list. For example,
As the WSJ notes, the danger of ranking by gold medals instead of total medals is that some countries (
Usually no statistical method gives a complete picture, and the medal count is no exception. Let's take a look here at how the medal count would look if we weighted the medals counts different ways, for example, by the country's population or per capita GDP. (This is using population and GDP purchasing power parity data from the CIA Factbook, and the medal count as of this morning 13 August 2008 around 10am EST).
As you can see on the below tables, the US drops to a still respectable 9th place when measuring total medals to per capita GDP. China, still a developing country, stays in second place, and Georgia closely trails Russia.
When measuring medals to total population, Armenia is the winner with 3 medals for a population of less than 3 million. Neither the US, China, or Russia makes the top ten of that ranking. If the US won as many medals as Armenia per population, then the US would have over 300 medals.
The point is that there are multiple legitimate ways to measure medal success, and we would do well to remember that the goal of the Olympic movement is "to contribute to building a peaceful and better world by educating youth through sport practised without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play." Of course it's far easier to just count medals.
Ranked by Total Medals to Per Capita GDP | ||||
Rank | Country | Gold | Total | GDP per capita |
1 | | 0 | 3 | $179 |
2 | | 17 | 27 | $5,256 |
3 | | 1 | 7 | $1,704 |
4 | | 0 | 1 | $889 |
5 | Kyrgyztan | 0 | 2 | $1,960 |
6 | | 2 | 12 | $14,840 |
7 | | 2 | 3 | $4,427 |
8 | | 0 | 3 | $4,474 |
9 | US | 10 | 29 | $45,553 |
10 | | 0 | 1 | $1,639 |
| | | | |
Ranked by Total Medals to Population | ||||
Rank | Country | Gold | Total | Population |
1 | | 0 | 3 | 2,968,586 |
2 | | 2 | 3 | 4,630,841 |
3 | | 4 | 12 | 20,600,856 |
4 | | 1 | 4 | 7,581,520 |
5 | | 0 | 1 | 2,007,711 |
6 | | 1 | 2 | 5,244,749 |
7 | Kyrgyztan | 0 | 2 | 5,356,869 |
8 | | 1 | 3 | 8,177,717 |
9 | | 1 | 2 | 5,455,407 |
10 | | 0 | 1 | 2,996,081 |
4 comments:
Nice blog, and interesting perspectives!
I like the listings by GDP and population. Maybe there should be divisions within the Olympics, so that the smaller/poorer countries compete only against each other, and therefore their athletes get more exposure (and more chance to win medals).
I was wondering if you can update the listings by GDP and population.
that was interesting.
An Armenian
Thanks. My computer is in the shop today getting fixed, so when I get it back with my files I'll update the listing, hopefully tomorrow.
Post a Comment